Wherever that ” upsurge of optimism” came from, lets hope that there’s plenty more to draw on.

Mark Serwotka spoke yesterday, Jan 21, about a need for an alternative to the established political parties in the UK, citing the occupy movement as an expression of the disenchantment that many people feel towards a system which if not broken completely, is in urgent need of repair.

Whatever you think about Mr Serwotka, the importance of keeping this discussion alive is beyond doubt.

However talking is only part of the answer. Your actions are fuelling questions being asked of the Government, Banks, Corporations and press which hopefully will lead to new conversations.

Best Wishes.

This timing, a day before the City of London Corporation served eviction orders that called for an eviction the subsequent day, on the 3rd of November, appears to blurs the line between the police and the authority that was proceeding with legal action.

It also alludes to the potential ties with the Corporations and multinational banks, even suggesting they are working under the control of big-business. This legal action was initiated by The City of London Corporation’s Planning and Transportation Committee, whose members include:
• Roger Gifford, chairman of the Association of Foreign Banks, which represents all foreign banks based in London.
• John White, an international banker who previously held a senior position at Lehman Brothers and recently retired as a senior executive at one of the US’s largest banking groups, the Toronto-Dominion Bank Financial Group.
• Tom Hoffman, a veteran international and investment banker;
• Oliver Lodge, a longstanding City professional with experience in investment management and regulation of the investment industry;
• James Pollard of asset manager Invesco Perpetual;
• Paul Judge, a former director general of the Conservative party, who now chairs Schroder Income Growth Fund.
• John Spanner, a former City professional who was head of group procurement at Standard Chartered Bank’ Robert Howard, who has worked in the City since 1993 at Charles Stanley & Co, one of Britain’s largest independent private client stockbroking and investment management firms
• Alan Yarrow, chair of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment and also of the wealth management group Kleinwort Benson.
• Ian Seaton, who worked in financial public relations before becoming master of one of the City of London’s ancient trade associations,
• Sophie Fernandes, an account director at Bellenden, which counts Canary Wharf Group among its clients.
The electoral structure of this council committee, as is the case with most of the City of London Corporation, disproportionally counts votes greatly in the favour of elites and corporate interests and is not democratically structured in the way other local authorities are. The only people to vote against this decision, on this committee, were the two councillors who represent residents that live within the City of London Corporation’s “square mile” and not companies.

The City of London Police, the City of London Corporation, the Multinational companies, banks, financial institutions and the Home Office have further links and shared agendas:
• The City of London Police is paid for and works for two bosses; in their figures from their website they state that in 2010-11, they received £26,616,000 directly from the government, £6,135,000 from other grants contributions and reimbursements and £1,711,000 from customers and client receipts. A great deal of the City of London Police’s non-Governmental sources of revenue is from big-business and financial institutions.
• The Home Secretary Theresa May would like to scrap the Human Rights Act, which includes the right to protest. The Home Secretary’s biographical website states, “She started her career at the Bank of England and went on to hold posts at the Association for Payment Clearing Services (APACS) as Head of the European Affairs Unit from 1989-1996, and Senior Adviser on International Affairs between 1996-97.” She also called publicly stated how she wishes to see an end to OccupyLSX.
• Corporations last year sponsored the British Government £2 billion.

Daniel Ashman’s Closing statement: in City of London’s attempt to evict Occupy LSX, judgement due 11th January

“The claimant has sought legal action from the outset; at first they joined the cathedral in that action. Then after that they have sort and collected many reports. At this point would like to quote the judge. “It’s accurate as far as it goes but it does not tell the story.’ Although I recognise that I am taking his meaning out of context. It resonated so much I felt compelled to write it down. ’It’s accurate as far as it goes but it does not tell the story’

What I hope I have done is added to this story. What is taking place now through a network of institutions culminates in genocide. The legal system definition of genocide is: “The deliberate and systematic destruction in any part of any ethnic, racial, religious or national group”

I believe that institutions in the proximity of the occupation, namely near the London Stock exchange and London’s Central Business District, have continued with the theft of land, theft of resources and murder. The means that are used are multifaceted and with respect I would like to bring to your honour’s and the court’s attention:

DISTRICT JUDGE@ MILDENHALL MAGISTRATES: REGINAV ANULLA ZELTERS + OTHERS
THE PLOUGHSHARES 4: HAWK FIGHTER LIVERPOOL: CROWN: 30th JULY 1996
SECTION 3: CRIMINAL LAW@ LAWFUL NECESSITY: LAWFUL CAUSE

1996 Liverpool jury acquitted four women caused £1.5 million damage to Hawk Fighter Jets at a British Aerospace factory

1999 3 women cleared of causing £80,000 damage to Trident nuclear submarines computer equipment

2000 Five Greenpeace volunteers not guilty of criminal damage after occupying an incinerator

2000 Norwich jury found Greenpeace Lord Melchett and 27 activists not guilty of criminal damage to field of GM crops

2008 Kingsnorth Trial, coal protesters cleared of criminal damage to Chimney.

I do believe like many others who stay in the tents that other avenues for recourse reparation, reconciliation and remedy, have been exhausted:
1. reporting of crimes ignored
2. protest not effective
3. petitions not listened to
4. lobbying not effective
5. elections not effective
6. private prosecutions ruled out by courts without justification
7. crimes not prosecuted
i. banking
ii. family law
iii. war and others

It is now five in the morning, I have not slept and I will shortly be leaving for Leicester. We have been searching for a number of court cases that have rulings of “lawful excuse.”

I would like to bring to the attention to the court once more to
REGINAV ANULLA ZELTER + OTHERS: LIVERPOOL CROWN COURT: THE PLOUGH SHARER 4: 30th July 1996

Perhaps by the time you get this we will have produced a written copy of the submission. It is worth noting after a three hour search we could not locate the transcript, only newspaper reports.

The actual measurement outside the Tea cafe when the width is reduced by the obstruction of tables and chairs is 3.8 metres. It seems strange to me that considering all the reports and documents the corporations have instructed Andrew Colvin to gather, that they have not taken accurate measurements for the true free foot-fall areas within business hours. This is quite a critical omission; I cannot dwell too much on words as I have to leave in 15 minutes.

Mr Wilkinson has admitted that people can access the Cathedral. Mr Cotton said “There was no pressing need to reopen the garden.” The City of London Police Representative described his force as one of the best in England, and I wish to compliment the police officers for their handling of some very sensitive issues and their cooperation with the occupy tranquillity team.

I wish the court to know that the team that has freely assembled and wished to contribute to my defence have done it from the camp: in the tents.

I give permission to Luke Wilkins and Steven Rushton to add what they feel is pertinent to our search for justice.

My untrained, voluntary legal assistant Steve Rushton is from Southampton, next year he will be writing a postgraduate study to critique Neo-liberalism from an Indigenous perspective. Currently he works in a school as a learning mentor. From his perspective he would like to add:

“Your honour, thank you for your patience, flexibility and accommodation
Without the tents, I would not be able to be part of this movement in weekends and using holidays. Occupy is an opportunity to discuss the many critical problems facing the world, including:
-the annihilation of indigenous peoples
-the destruction of the commons and the global environments
-the injustices of the world, such as war and slavery
-the severe inequalities of the Neo-liberal world

Occupy and the tents allow me to join a global inclusive dialogue to engender a just, universally sustainable and equitable coherent alternative to the current system. I would question the motives and loyalties of anyone who wanted to stop this dialogue. Your honour with respect I ask, please do not end this: the most important possible human conversation.”

in solidarity, caroline X